Proposed Changes Aim to Attract New NAPCN
Members
By Robert Hadden Mole
Vol. 4, Issue 2 (Fall 2000)
Two important
initiatives were tabled at the NAPCN business meeting at New Paltz this
year. Both initiatives may have implications for the future of the
NAPCN and the network’s ability to attract new members.
The first
initiative is the proposal of a shared subsection of both NAPCN and APA
Division 32 (Humanistic Psychology) organizations. This subsection is
to be called “Proponents of Constructivist Psychology” (PCP). Current
members of Division 32 who have an interest in constructivism can join
PCP. Their membership to PCP is planned to include a discounted
membership fee to NAPCN. Current members of NAPCN can join PCP and also
enjoy the discounted membership to NAPCN. Additionally, these NAPCN
members can meet more often with other constructivists in North
America—in even years at NAPCN conferences as they usually do, and every
year at the national APA conventions.
Although the
exact fee for the discounted membership is still under review, it is
believed that the discount can be achieved without any great loss to the
Network. By attracting new members and expanding the membership base,
the NAPCN will draw more income to cover operating costs. NAPCN
president, Jon Raskin will present the PCP proposal to APA’s Division 32
at their mid-winter meeting in January, 2001.
The second
initiative is the proposal of a new name for the NAPCN. Members have
brought up the idea of a name change in years past (see “The Future of
NAPCN” article, Vol 4, Issue 1). The reason for the name change seems
based primarily on the fact that the “Personal Construct” label may
define the scope of the organization too narrowly. Although the NAPCN
holds firm footing in the Personal Construct Psychology of George Kelly,
the constructivism the group stands for has evolved considerably over
the past quarter century. The broad label “constructivism” may be a
more accurate one for what the group represents today.
Several new names
were suggested in the business meeting, among these were the “North
American Constructivist Society”, and the “Pan-American
Constructivist Association”. While the business meeting attendees
appeared to be set on using the “constructivist” label, some debate
took place over the geographic designation of the organization;
whether the organization should focus on North America, or both
North and South America. Clearly the name change is somewhat
dependent on the direction the organization feels it needs to take
over the coming years. The NAPCN steering committee plans to work
on name change possibilities over the next several months.