|
Constructivist Chronicle

Sixteenth International Congress Brings Back
Memories of Ohio State Days
Vol. 9, Issue 2
(Fall 2005)
Go to photo
Columbus 2005 Congress’s keynote speaker was Dr. Franz Epting. An
appropriate choice, he was one of the last of George Kelly’s many
graduate students to attend Ohio State, and more importantly, the
fabled Thursday evening sessions at the Kelly home. Dr. Epting was
able to share some of his experience of returning to Ohio State in an
interview with the Chronicle.
Although most of the congress
took place at the Holiday Inn across from the Ohio State campus, the
university did an excellent job of hosting the congress.
Franz:
They did such a good job in welcoming us. It was such a nice
reception. Dr. Gifford Weary of the psychology department gave a nice
welcoming talk. It was a special treat to have the banquet in the
faculty club. The faculty club, when I was a graduate student, was a
special place where a faculty member would occasionally take a student.
Those
attending the congress were able to partake in tours of both Kelly
houses and the gravesite of George and Gladys Kelly at the Walnut Grove
Cemetery in Columbus. The tour of the first house was limited to a
streetside viewing, as the owners were on vacation while the tour was
taking place. Information about the houses was provided Kelly’s
daughter, Jackie Aldridge. The tour was led by Franz.
Franz:
Kelly’s first house on Oxford Street was interesting. Although we
couldn’t tour the house at all, we were able to see the window of the
study in which Kelly had written The Psychology of Personal
Constructs. The second house on Medick Way was designed by Kelly
himself. He included a passive solar design with a long roof
overhang. The house looks very modern. The patio behind the house was
hand-laid by Kelly based on the mathematical constant ‘e’. The woman
who bought the house from Kelly had not changed anything in the
basement. You could see some of Kelly’s writing on a foundational wall
in the basement.
Jay
Efran, another former student of Kelly’s was also there. Jay and Franz
were able to sit in two chairs in the same spot as what they had
occupied while attending meetings with other students at Kelly’s house
In addition to visiting Kelly’s former houses, Franz was also able to revisit some on-campus haunts as well.
Franz:
After looking for some time, I was able to find Kelly’s old office in
Arps Hall. It was hard to find the door to his office. The office
looks terribly plain now. It was never plain back then. I was also
able to visit the old dorm that I ran when I was a master’s student.
It is still looking very nice.
Franz indicated that returning to many of these once-familiar places stirred up a lot of memories and raised many old emotions.
Franz:
It was quite emotional. I had remembered all the pleasant times and all
the fun. But it [the graduate program in the late 1950’s and early
1960’s] was terribly tough—needlessly so. There was needlessly high
anxiety. It was a meat-grinder of a program. I remember walking into
the first class held by Professor Don Meyer. He uttered a phrase that
we hear a lot now, but I had never heard it until that day: “Look to
your right, and then look to your left—one of the students you are
sitting between will have quit the program by the end of the year”. It
was really intense. I remember thinking “Am I going to make it?”
There
was a lot of competition between the students. But there was an awful
lot of reading, too, and the only way to get through it all was to
share the reading assignments. This led to a close knit group of
students. We had to rely on each other.
It
was formal, very formal, but there was a notion of a personal touch
that doesn’t happen anymore. So there was an informality coupled with
a highly formal pressure. Kelly was very encouraging of the students
in his groups. Often he was working hard to find them positions
elsewhere. He was very encouraging. He was doing nice things for you
behind your back. He was very supportive—always on the lookout for
jobs for you.
I
don’t want to underestimate the excitement. It was exciting to be part
of that group. There was a feeling that we were all involved in
something really important.
One
wonders if something from the graduate experience has been lost. With
present-day graduate programs having people on limited terms of
residency and undertaking distance education, the intensity of the
programs and the group cohesion is no doubt somewhat different.
Franz:
We wanted to set up a different atmosphere when I went to the
University of Florida. Something less intense. University was much
more intense back then. People were less apologetic about being firm.

George
Kelly |